Avi Patel
03 / Systems & Workflows
AeroLab
A six-degree-of-freedom simulation workspace for vehicle motion, sensor faults, estimator experiments, and telemetry review.
Python · NumPy · 6DOF dynamics · Sensor models
Simulation2026
12 / Independent full-stack prototype
SignalLaunch
Keep a technical handoff connected to its evidence.
A document-workflow prototype for extracting evidence, exposing gaps, and drafting structured engineering handoffs.
- Context
- Independent full-stack prototype
- When
- 2026
- Stage
- Document-workflow prototype
- Tools & methods
- FastAPI · Next.js · Document extraction · Evidence maps · Reporting
Conceptual system sequence
- 01Extract
- 02Trace
- 03Review
- 04Export
A visual explanation of the workflow.
01 / Context
The problem
Technical documents often contain the ingredients for a decision without providing a clear path from each statement to its supporting evidence. Missing information can be easy to overlook in a polished summary.
02 / Ownership
My contribution
I built a FastAPI and Next.js prototype that combines document parsing and extraction with evidence maps, readiness workflows, and deterministic demo exports. It explores how to make the source behind a technical handoff easier to inspect.
03 / Architecture
How it works
- 01
Extract
Parse demonstration documents into structured information.
- 02
Trace
Connect statements and handoff fields to supporting evidence.
- 03
Review
Expose gaps through a readiness and review workflow.
- 04
Export
Produce a structured draft for a person to review and refine.
04 / Validation
Evidence & scope
- Public application source for the FastAPI and Next.js prototype.
- Deterministic demonstration documents and output structure.
- Evidence mapping and readiness workflows in the implemented application.
Project scope
Early prototype using demonstration documents and deterministic drafting, with outputs prepared for human review.
05 / Perspective
Engineering takeaway
A useful generated draft should make verification easier. Traceability and visible gaps give a reviewer a better starting point than an unsupported impression of completeness.